4.6 Article

One-step preparation of magnetic Janus particles using controlled phase separation of polymer blends and nanoparticles

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 29, 页码 11801-11806

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra41394b

关键词

-

资金

  1. WCU (World Class University) program through National Research Foundation of Korea [R33-2008-000-10163-0]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0087691]
  3. National Leading Research Laboratory Program through National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0018607]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  5. Brain Korea 21 projects by the Korean Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a simple method with the aid of a microfluidic droplet-generation technique to fabricate magnetic Janus particles by utilizing a solvent evaporation-induced phase separation and preferential partitioning of magnetic nanoparticles in the polymer blends. Non-aqueous emulsion droplets of the polymer blends and nanoparticles solution are produced to become Janus particles after the evaporation of the solvent. The stabilizing polymer of the nanoparticles, which is compatible only with one of the polymer blends to be phase-separated, plays a key role in the anisotropic positioning of the nanoparticles in the Janus particles. Using this phase separation-based method and microfluidics, excellent control over the size, size distribution, and morphology of the particles is achieved. Especially, we could control the morphology of the Janus particles easily by varying the volume ratio of the polymers. However, with an analysis of the shapes of resulting Janus particles, we found that non-equilibrium aspects of the evaporation-induced phase separation play a major role in determining the particle morphology. We expect that the versatility of this method in the choice of polymer blends and functional nanoparticles will enable the fabrication of colloids with various functionality and desired morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据