4.6 Article

Strategy of cross-linked enzyme aggregates onto magnetic particles adapted to the green design of biocatalytic synthesis of glycerol carbonate

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 4052-4058

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra23222k

关键词

-

资金

  1. PN II HR YT-96 program from CNCSIS [91/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new strategy for the preparation of biocatalysts based on enzyme immobilization was explored, leading to cross-linked enzyme aggregate onto magnetic particles (CLEMPA). Lipase enzyme from Aspergillus niger was precipitated from aqueous solution followed by cross-linking of the enzyme aggregates onto magnetic particles using glutaraldehyde as cross-linker. An optimization study has been carried out for the CLEMPA approach to determine the best experimental conditions for both preparation steps (i.e. enzyme precipitation and cross-linking of the enzyme aggregates onto magnetic particles). Type and concentration of the precipitation agent, type and size of magnetic particles, ratio of lipase to magnetic particles, concentration of the cross-linker and growth time of CLEMPA clusters were the experimental factors taken under investigation. Characterization of CLEMPA biocatalyst considering the cluster size and lipase loading was performed using light scattering detection and UV-vis spectrophotometric techniques. The catalytic capacity of CLEMPA biocatalyst was tested with the green alternative of glycerol carbonate (GlyC) synthesis. CLEMPA catalyzed the conversion of glycerol to GlyC with an excess of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) providing solvent-free conditions for the reaction. These experiments resulted in encouraging biocatalytic performance with 61% glycerol conversion, 55% GlyC yield and 90% selectivity in GlyC. CLEMPA biocatalyst was also tested in the reaction of crude glycerol extracted from the biodiesel process, with similar performance results. Recycling experiments for 20 successive reaction cycles demonstrated the robustness of the prepared CLEMPA structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据