4.6 Article

Simulation of VOCs oxidation in a catalytic nanolith

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 1103-1111

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra22878e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21036009, 21106189]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [S2011040001767]
  3. Foundation from Educational Commission of Guangdong Province, China [LYM11004]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Huizhou, China [2011B010003006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) structure consists of an assembly of identical pores having nanometer dimensions that span a flow reactor so as to produce an array of nano reactors, named as a catalytic nanolith. In order to understand the applicability of the nanolith in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) catalytic combustion and correlate the catalytic performance of the nanolith with its structure, a theoretical analysis of an AAO nanolith reactor dispersed with Pt for the catalytic combustion of selected VOCs (a mixture of naphthalene, propylene, propane and methane) is reported. A one-dimensional adiabatic reactor model has been developed, in which a mixed flow model considering the effect of component diffusion inside the nanopores was adopted, and the pressure drop across the nanolith nanopores as well as the exothermic nature of VOCs combustion were considered. The influence of the operational and design parameters, such as inlet temperature, pressure, and the balance gas as well as the Pt loading density, pore size and wall thickness, on the nanolith performance were studied. The results show that the pressure drop and component diffusion contributions play important roles in the performance of the nanolith reactor. These two factors also relate to the nanolith reactor design parameters, such as pore size, wall thickness and Pt dispersion etc. Considering that all these parameters plus its reactivity can all be readily tailored, the AAO nanolith reactor offers the potential for applications in VOCs catalytic combustion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据