4.6 Article

Macromonomer-induced CdTe quantum dots toward multicolor fluorescent patterns and white LEDs

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 2, 期 24, 页码 9005-9010

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra20950k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21076103, 21176122]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China-NSAF [10976012]
  3. Natural Science Foundations for Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [09KJB530005]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report an available route for the synthesis of poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) macromonomers/N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC)-co-capped CdTe quantum dots (QDs) toward multicolor fluorescent patterns and warm white LED devices. The properties of the as-prepared CdTe QDs herein were thoroughly investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR), ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis), photoluminescence (PL), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. We have found that the PMAA/NAC-capped CdTe QDs exhibited stable and strong photoluminescence (PL) with a narrow size distribution and a high quantum yield (QY) of similar to 45%. Moreover, the as-prepared CdTe QDs demonstrated a quick growth rate and favorable fluorescent stability without any aggregation and phase separation when they were blended with a polymer matrix. Subsequently, by virtue of their excellent polymer-compatibility, we extended the water-soluble PMAA/NAC-capped CdTe QDs as fluorescent ink for multicolor fluorescent patterns by silk screen printing, which may find application in the anti-counterfeit field. In addition, we explored the robust CdTe QDs as red phosphor to fabricate a white LED device, the resulted LED emitted a higher rendering color index (CRI) warm white light compared to the conventional phosphor-only LEDs. It is believed that the route reported here could offer an available pathway to achieve robust QDs for diverse applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据