4.3 Article

A pilot study of observed physician-parent-child communication and child satisfaction in a gastroenterology clinic

期刊

PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 1327-1335

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S171620

关键词

physician-patient communication; partnership; child participation; pediatric patient experience; child satisfaction

资金

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  2. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Child participation in pediatric medical visits is low. In this pilot study, we sought to better understand relationships between observed communication and child-reported perceptions of communication in a clinical setting. Materials and methods: For this cross-sectional observational study, pediatric gastroenterology appointments (n=39) were videotaped and coded to quantify various adult affective (eg, chit-chat, empathy) and facilitative (eg, asking questions, encouraging responses) behaviors toward the child, interference with child participation (eg, interrupting or ignoring child), and child verbal participation. Post-visit surveys assessed child perceptions of having voice in the clinical encounter, ease of understanding, and satisfaction with communication. Results: Parent and provider chit-chat was associated with child-reported ease of understanding. Provider facilitation was positively associated with child participation, but affective communication strategies were not. Physician interference was negatively associated with ease of understanding but positively associated with perception of voice. Conclusion: Facilitative communication may improve outcomes by enhancing child participation and thus exchange of medical information, whereas chit-chat appears to positively impact children's perceptions of communication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据