4.3 Article

PAK6 increase chemoresistance and is a prognostic marker for stage II and III colon cancer patients undergoing 5-FU based chemotherapy

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 355-367

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2803

关键词

p21-activated kinase 6; Colon cancer; 5-fluorouracil; Chemoresistance

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program [SS2014AA020803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81220108021, 81072008]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [11431921000]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Hospital [SHDC12012105]
  5. Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute [12DZ942500]
  6. Shanghai JiaoTong University [YG2012ZD01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

p21-Activated kinase 6 (PAK6) has been implicated in radiotherapy and docetaxel resistance. We have further evaluated PAK6 as a predictor of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment response in colon cancer. Here we report that in colon cancer PAK6 promotes tumor progression and chemoresistance both in vitro and in vivo. In the clinical analysis, PAK6 was overexpressed in 104 of 147 (70.75%) stage II and III patients who received 5-FU based chemotherapy after surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that PAK6 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001). Colon cancer cell lines showed increased PAK6 expression upon 5-FU treatment. In PAK6-knockdown cells treated with 5-FU, cell viability and phosphorylation of BAD decreased, and the number of apoptotic cells, levels of cleaved caspase 3 and PARP increased compared to control cells. The opposite was observed in PAK6 overexpressing cells. Short hairpin RNA knockdown of PAK6 blocked cells in G2-M phase. Furthermore, Animal experiments results in vivo are consistent with outcomes in vitro. This study demonstrates that PAK6 is an independent prognostic factor for adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据