4.3 Article

Using heterogeneity of the patient-derived xenograft model to identify the chemoresistant population in ovarian cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 5, 期 18, 页码 8750-8764

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2373

关键词

Ovarian Cancer; Patient-derived xenograft; cancer stem cells; chemoresistance; animal models of cancer

资金

  1. UAB Medical Scientist Training Program [NIGMS T32GM008361]
  2. Norma Livingston Ovarian Cancer Foundation
  3. University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Clinical and Translational Science [5UL1RR025777]
  4. Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Academy [OC093443]
  5. CDMRP [546105, OC093443] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cornerstone of preclinical cancer research has been the use of clonal cell lines. However, this resource has underperformed in its ability to effectively identify novel therapeutics and evaluate the heterogeneity in a patient's tumor. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model retains the heterogeneity of patient tumors, allowing a means to not only examine efficacy of a therapy, but also basic tenets of cancer biology in response to treatment. Herein we describe the development and characterization of an ovarian-PDX model in order to study the development of chemoresistance. We demonstrate that PDX tumors are not simply composed of tumor-initiating cells, but recapitulate the original tumor's heterogeneity, oncogene expression profiles, and clinical response to chemotherapy. Combined carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment of PDX tumors enriches the cancer stem cell populations, but persistent tumors are not entirely composed of these populations. RNA-Seq analysis of six pair of treated PDX tumors compared to untreated tumors demonstrates a consistently contrasting genetic profile after therapy, suggesting similar, but few, pathways are mediating chemoresistance. Pathways and genes identified by this methodology represent novel approaches to targeting the chemoresistant population in ovarian cancer

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据