4.3 Article

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene amplification is associated with poor survival in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 2562-2572

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2944

关键词

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; gene amplification; fluorescent in situ hybridization; prognostic factor

资金

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI12C1440]
  2. Yonsei University College of Medicine [6-2012-0044]
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2013M3C8A1078501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the frequency and the prognostic impact of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene amplification in 526 curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Using fluorescent in situ hybridization, high amplification was defined by an FGFR1/centromer 8 ratio is >= 2.0, or average number of FGFR1 signals/tumor cell nucleus >= 6.0, or percentage of tumor cells containing >= 15 FGFR1 signals or large cluster in >= 10%. Low amplification was defined by >= 5 FGFR1 signals in >= 50%. FGFR2 and FGFR3 mutations were assessed by direct sequencing in 388 cases and no mutation was detected. High and low amplification were detected in 8.6% and 1.1%, respectively. High FGFR1 amplification had significantly shorter disease-free survival (34.0 vs 158.5 months P=0.019) and overall survival (52.2 vs not reached P=0.022) than low/no amplification group. After adjusting for sex, smoking, stage, histology, and adjuvant treatment, high FGFR1 amplification had a greater risk of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.6; P=0.029) and death (AHR, 1.53; P=0.050). High amplification was significantly higher in current smokers than former and never-smokers (P-trend<0.001) and increased proportional to smoking dosage. High FGFR1 amplification is a frequent oncogenic alteration and an independent poor prognostic factor in resected ESCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据