4.7 Article

Characterization of Oilseed Lipids from DHA-Producing Camelina sativa: A New Transformed Land Plant Containing Long-Chain Omega-3 Oils

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 776-789

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu6020776

关键词

omega-3; phospholipids; glycolipids; DHA; long-chain PUFA; triacylglycerol; docosahexaenoic acid; fish oils; Camelina sativa; polar lipids

资金

  1. CSIRO Food Futures Flagship
  2. Nuseed Pty Ltd. Laverton, Australia
  3. Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New and sustainable sources of long-chain (LC, >= C-20) omega-3 oils containing DHA (docosahexaenoic acid, 22:6 omega 3) are required to meet increasing demands. The lipid content of the oilseed of a novel transgenic, DHA-producing land plant, Camelina sativa, containing microalgal genes able to produce LC omega-3 oils, contained 36% lipid by weight with triacylglycerols (TAG) as the major lipid class in hexane extracts (96% of total lipid). Subsequent chloroform-methanol (CM) extraction recovered further lipid (similar to 50% polar lipid, comprising glycolipids and phospholipids) and residual TAG. The main phospholipid species were phosphatidyl choline and phosphatidyl ethanolamine. The % DHA was: 6.8% (of total fatty acids) in the TAG-rich hexane extract and 4.2% in the polar lipid-rich CM extract. The relative level of ALA (alpha-linolenic acid, 18:3 omega 3) in DHA-camelina seed was higher than the control. Major sterols in both DHA- and control camelina seeds were: sitosterol, campesterol, cholesterol, brassicasterol and isofucosterol. C-16-C-22 fatty alcohols, including iso-branched and odd-chain alcohols were present, including high levels of iso-17:0, 17:0 and 19:0. Other alcohols present were: 16:0, iso-18:0, 18:0 and 18:1 and the proportions varied between the hexane and CM extracts. These iso-branched odd-chain fatty alcohols, to our knowledge, have not been previously reported. These components may be derived from wax esters, or free fatty alcohols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据