4.7 Review

Vitamin A Derivatives as Treatment Options for Retinal Degenerative Diseases

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 2646-2666

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/nu5072646

关键词

vitamin A; all-trans-retinol; 11-cis-retinal; retina; visual cycle; carotenoids; 9-cis-retinyl acetate; retinal pigmented epithelium; photoreceptor; Leber congenital amaurosis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K08EY019880, P30 EY11373]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  4. Midwest Eye Bank
  5. Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The visual cycle is a sequential enzymatic reaction for vitamin A, all-trans-retinol, occurring in the outer layer of the human retina and is essential for the maintenance of vision. The central source of retinol is derived from dietary intake of both retinol and pro-vitamin A carotenoids. A series of enzymatic reactions, located in both the photoreceptor outer segment and the retinal pigment epithelium, transform retinol into the visual chromophore 11-cis-retinal, regenerating visual pigments. Retina specific proteins carry out the majority of the visual cycle, and any significant interruption in this sequence of reactions is capable of causing varying degrees of blindness. Among these important proteins are Lecithin:retinol acyltransferase (LRAT) and retinal pigment epithelium-specific 65-kDa protein (RPE65) known to be responsible for esterification of retinol to all-trans-retinyl esters and isomerization of these esters to 11-cis-retinal, respectively. Deleterious mutations in these genes are identified in human retinal diseases that cause blindness, such as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Herein, we discuss the pathology of 11-cis-retinal deficiency caused by these mutations in both animal disease models and human patients. We also review novel therapeutic strategies employing artificial visual chromophore 9-cis-retinoids which have been employed in clinical trials involving LCA patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据