4.6 Article

Multi-Scale Measurement of Regional Inequality in Mainland China during 2005-2010 Using DMSP/OLS Night Light Imagery and Population Density Grid Data

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 13469-13499

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su71013469

关键词

regional inequality; China; Lorenz Curve; night light; remote sensing

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [ZRY2014001235]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Surveying AMP
  4. Mapping and Geoinformation Research in the Public Interest [201512026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the Night Light Development Index (NLDI) to measure the regional inequality of public services in Mainland China at multiple scales. The NLDI was extracted based on a Gini Coefficient approach to measure the spatial differences of population distribution and night light distribution. Population data were derived from the dataset of China's population density grid, and night light data were acquired from satellite imagery. In the multi-scale analysis, we calculated the NLDI for China as a whole, eight economic regions, 31 provincial regions, and 354 prefectural cities for the two years of 2005 and 2010. The results indicate that Southwest China and Northwest China are the regions with the most unequal public services, with NLDI values of 0.7116 and 0.7251 for 2005, respectively, and 0.6678 and 0.6304 for 2010, respectively. In contrast, Northern Coastal China had the lowest NLDI values of 0.4775 and 0.4312 for 2005 and 2010, respectively, indicating that this region had the most equal public services. Also, the regional inequality of Mainland China in terms of NLDI has been reduced from 0.6161 to 0.5743 during 2005-2010. The same pattern was observed from the provincial and prefectural analysis, suggesting that public services in Mainland China became more equal within the five-year period. A regression analysis indicated that provincial and prefectural regions with more public services per capita and higher population density had more equal public services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据