3.8 Article

Evaluation of a screening protocol using auscultation and portable echocardiography to detect asymptomatic rheumatic heart disease in Tongan schoolchildren

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1185

关键词

echocardiography; epidemiology; rheumatic heart disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is an important problem in developing countries; however, many cases are detected only when the disease has progressed to cardiac failure. Screening can detect cases earlier, but there are no screening guidelines. Methods We performed a cross-sectional screening study in Tonga among 5,053 primary school children, in whom auscultation followed by echocardiography of those with heart murmurs were used to identify RHD. We also analyzed whether a three-stage screening protocol of auscultation performed by a medical student to detect any heart murmur, second-stage auscultation performed by a local pediatrician to differentiate pathological from innocent murmurs and echocardiography of those with pathological murmurs altered outcomes. Results The prevalence of definite RHD was 33.2 per 1,000. The prevalence of RHD increased significantly with age, peaking at 42.6 per 1,000 in children aged 10-12 years. Most valve lesions (91 [54%] of 169) were mild. Auscultation to detect pathological murmurs was poorly sensitive (46.4%), and the finding of any murmur on auscultation did not affect the likelihood of detecting pathology on echocardiography. The finding of a pathological murmur did significantly increase the likelihood of detecting pathology on echocardiography, but still missed 54% of those with pathology (mainly RHD) detected on echocardiography. Conclusions Screening is a useful method for detecting asymptomatic RHD in regions of high prevalence and we report a high echocardiographically confirmed prevalence. The most appropriate screening strategy remains to be confirmed, however, and implementation will depend on the availability of echocardiography and trained staff.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据