4.8 Article

Seasonally dependent responses of subtropical highs and tropical rainfall to anthropogenic warming

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 787-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0244-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program
  2. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  3. US DOE's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The subtropical highs are semi-permanent atmospheric features that strengthen during April-September, exerting a large influence on regional rainfall(1-5). Previous studies have focused on the changes of subtropical highs during their peak season (June-August)(6-8), but little is known about their changes in other seasons. Here, a suite of multi-model simulations are used to demonstrate the robust seasonally dependent responses of subtropical highs and tropical rainfall to anthropogenic warming. The zonal-mean subtropical highs in the Northern Hemisphere are shown to strengthen more during April-June than July-September, with opposite responses for the Southern Hemisphere counterparts. These responses are closely related to a southward shift of tropical rainfall in April-June relative to July-September, manifesting in a seasonal delay of tropical rainfall and monsoon onset in the Northern Hemisphere(9,10). Such seasonality is found to occur in response to elevated latent energy demand in the hemisphere warming up seasonally, as dictated by the Clausius-Clapeyron relation. The interhemispheric energy contrast drives a southward shift of tropical rainfall that strengthens the Hadley cell and zonal-mean subtropical highs in the Northern Hemisphere in April-June relative to July-September. These changes scale linearly with warming, with increasing implications for projecting climate changes in the tropics and subtropics as warming continues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据