4.8 Article

Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 570-576

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2258

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)
  2. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  3. UK Met Office and Natural Environment Research Council (UKMO-NERC) [NE/1006680/1]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [jwcrp01003, NE/I006680/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [jwcrp01003, NE/I006680/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intensification of precipitation extremes with climate change(1) is of key importance to society as a result of the large impact through flooding. Observations show that heavy rainfall is increasing on daily timescales in many regions(2), but how changes will manifest themselves on sub-daily timescales remains highly uncertain. Here we perform the first climate change experiments with a very high resolution (1.5 km grid spacing) model more typically used for weather forecasting, in this instance for a region of the UK. The model simulates realistic hourly rainfall characteristics, including extremes(3,4), unlike coarser resolution climate models(5,6), giving us confidence in its ability to project future changes at this timescale. We find the 1.5 km model shows increases in hourly rainfall intensities in winter, consistent with projections from a coarser 12 km resolution model and previous studies at the daily timescale(7). However, the 1.5 km model also shows a future intensification of short-duration rain in summer, with significantly more events exceeding the high thresholds indicative of serious flash flooding. We conclude that accurate representation of the local storm dynamics is an essential requirement for predicting changes to convective extremes; when included we find for the model here that summer downpours intensify with warming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据