4.8 Article

Projected continent-wide declines of the emperor penguin under climate change

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 715-718

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2280

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute Paul Emile Victor [IPEV 109]
  2. CIRES
  3. WHOI
  4. Grayce B. Kerr Fund
  5. Penzance Endowed Fund
  6. NSF [DEB-1145017]
  7. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  8. ERC [322989]
  9. NERC [cpom30001] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [cpom30001] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Division Of Environmental Biology
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145017] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [322989] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change has been projected to affect species distribution(1) and future trends of local populations(2,3), but projections of global population trends are rare. We analyse global population trends of the emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri), an iconic Antarctic top predator, under the influence of sea ice conditions projected by coupled climate models assessed in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) effort(4). We project the dynamics of all 45 known emperor penguin colonies(5) by forcing a sea-ice-dependent demographic model(6,7) with local, colony-specific, sea ice conditions projected through to the end of the twenty-first century. Dynamics differ among colonies, but by 2100 all populations are projected to be declining. At least two-thirds are projected to have declined by > 50% from their current size. The global population is projected to have declined by at least 19%. Because criteria to classify species by their extinction risk are based on the global population dynamics(8), global analyses are critical for conservation(9). We discuss uncertainties arising in such global projections and the problems of defining conservation criteria for species endangered by future climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据