4.8 Article

The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 497-501

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1832

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [SES-0962625]
  2. NOAA [NA11OAR4310095]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP100100495]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [962625] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [962559] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Australian Research Council [LP100100495] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Statistical studies of rainfed maize yields in the United States(1) and elsewhere(2) have indicated two clear features: a strong negative yield response to accumulation of temperatures above 30 degrees C (or extreme degree days (EDD)), and a relatively weak response to seasonal rainfall. Here we show that the process-based Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) is able to reproduce both of these relationships in the Midwestern United States and provide insight into underlying mechanisms. The predominant effects of EDD in APSIM are associated with increased vapour pressure deficit, which contributes to water stress in two ways: by increasing demand for soil water to sustain a given rate of carbon assimilation, and by reducing future supply of soil water by raising transpiration rates. APSIM computes daily water stress as the ratio of water supply to demand, and during the critical month of July this ratio is three times more responsive to 2 degrees C warming than to a 20% precipitation reduction. The results suggest a relatively minor role for direct heat stress on reproductive organs at present temperatures in this region. Effects of elevated CO2 on transpiration efficiency should reduce yield sensitivity to EDD in the coming decades, but at most by 25%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据