4.8 Article

Increased greenhouse-gas intensity of rice production under future atmospheric conditions

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 288-291

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1712

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology [DEB-0949460]
  2. US Department of Energy's Office of Science (BER) through the Western Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research at Northern Arizona University
  3. Irish Research Council
  4. Marie Curie Actions under FP7

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased atmospheric CO2 and rising temperatures are expected to affect rice yields and greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions from rice paddies(1-4). This is important, because rice cultivation is one of the largest human-induced sources of the potent GHG methane(5) (CH4) and rice is the world's second-most produced staple crop(6). The need for meeting a growing global food demand(7) argues for assessing GHG emissions from croplands on the basis of yield rather than land area(8-10), such that efforts to reduce GHG emissions take into consideration the consequences for food production. However, it is unclear whether or how the GHG intensity (that is, yield-scaled GHG emissions) of cropping systems will be affected by future atmospheric conditions. Here we show, using meta-analysis, that increased atmospheric CO2 (ranging from 550 to 743 ppmV) and warming (ranging from +0.8 degrees C to +6 degrees C) both increase the GHG intensity of rice cultivation. Increased atmospheric CO2 increased GHG intensity by 31.4%, because CH4 emissions are stimulated more than rice yields. Warming increased GHG intensity by 11.8% per 1 degrees C, largely owing to a decrease in yield. This analysis suggests that rising CO2 and warming will approximately double the GHG intensity of rice production by the end of the twenty-first century, stressing the need for management practices that optimize rice production while reducing its GHG intensity as the climate continues to change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据