3.8 Article

The delimitation of Antarctic and bipolar species of neuropogonoid Usnea (Ascomycota, Lecanorales):: a cohesion approach of species recognition for the Usnea perpusilla complex

期刊

MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 472-484

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.05.006

关键词

bipolar; cohesion species concept; Neuropogon; species complex; species delimitation; taxonomy; Usnea

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species of the Neuropogon group in the lichen genus Usnea have their Centre of distribution in polar regions of the Southern Hemisphere. Their morphological and chemical variability is poorly understood and several asexual taxa with uncertain relationships to fertile taxa occur in the group. The species concept is controversial. A phylogenetic analysis revealed three related complexes of mainly asexual lineages arranged around three fertile Usnea species: U. aurantiaco-atra, U. trachycarpa and U. perpusilla. In this study a dataset of 80 specimens was used to resolve species circumscriptions in the U. perpusilla complex. We used a phylogenetic and a haplotype network approach based on three gene fragments (ITS, IGS and RPB1) to detect distinct lineages. To support the hypothesis that these lineages represent different species, we tested for correlation of morphological and chemical characters with hierarchical nested haplotype groups, employing statistical tests of contingency tables and analysis of variance (ANOVA). This cohesion species recognition method detected three fertile U. perpusilla lineages. We could also delimit an undescribed fertile species with yellow apothecia and a new asexual species from the High Andes. Interestingly, there is an additional bipolar species, U. lambii, which was formerly confused with U. sphacelata. The fact that U. lambii shows a geographically disjunct distribution pattern, but the genetic distances among specimens are low, points to recent long-distance dispersal. (C) 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据