4.6 Article

Model-based approaches to unconstrained ordination

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 399-411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12236

关键词

correspondence analysis; latent variable model; mixture model; multivariate analysis; non-metric multidimensional scaling

类别

资金

  1. Research Excellence Award - University of New South Wales
  2. CSIRO PhD Scholarship
  3. Academy of Finland [256291]
  4. Marine Biodiversity Hub
  5. Australian Government's National Environmental Research Program (NERP)
  6. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [256291, 256291] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unconstrained ordination is commonly used in ecology to visualize multivariate data, in particular, to visualize the main trends between different sites in terms of their species composition or relative abundance. Methods of unconstrained ordination currently used, such as non-metric multidimensional scaling, are algorithm-based techniques developed and implemented without directly accommodating the statistical properties of the data at hand. Failure to account for these key data properties can lead to misleading results. A model-based approach to unconstrained ordination can address this issue, and in this study, two types of models for ordination are proposed based on finite mixture models and latent variable models. Each method is capable of handling different data types and different forms of species response to latent gradients. Further strengths of the models are demonstrated via example and simulation. Advantages of model-based approaches to ordination include the following: residual analysis tools for checking assumptions to ensure the fitted model is appropriate for the data; model selection tools to choose the most appropriate model for ordination; methods for formal statistical inference to draw conclusions from the ordination; and improved efficiency, that is model-based ordination better recovers true relationships between sites, when used appropriately.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据