4.6 Article

Preparation and Characterization of Macroalgae Biochar Nanomaterials with Highly Efficient Adsorption and Photodegradation Ability

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma11091709

关键词

nanomaterial; kelp biochar; adsorption capacity; photocatalytic activity; removal efficiency

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China [LQ16D060004]
  2. Key Research and Development Projects of Zhejiang Province of China [2018C02043]
  3. Demonstration Project of Marine Economic Innovation and Development of Zhoushan City of China
  4. Demonstration Project of Marine Economic Innovation and Development of Yantai City of China [YHCX-SW-L-201705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, carbonized kelp biochar (AKB) modified by KOH impregnation and photocatalytic Bi2MoO6/AKB composite (BKBC) nanomaterials were the first time successfully synthesized for efficient removal of dyes in aqueous solution. BET, XRD, FT-IR, and SEM were employed to characterize as-prepared samples. UV-vis and other test results indicated that the removal efficiency of methylene blue (MB) was 61.39% and 94.12% for BKBC and AKB, respectively, which was up to 13 times and 20 times higher in comparison with pure Bi2MoO6 (PBM). In addition, the equilibrium adsorption capacity of MB could reach up to 324.1 mg/g for AKB. This high dyes adsorption performance could be likely attributed to its high specific surface area (507.177 m(2)/g) and its abundant presence of various functional groups such as -OH and =C-H on AKB. Particularly, the existing of amorphous carbon and transition metal oxides, such as Fe2O3 and Mn5O8, could be beneficial for the photodegradation of MB for AKB. Meanwhile, experimental data indicated that adsorption kinetics complied with the pseudo-second order model well, and all of the tests had satisfactory results in terms of the highly efficient adsorption and photodegradation activity of AKB nanomaterials, which suggested its great potential in wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据