4.6 Article

Co-Production of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Fermentable Sugars Assisted by Endoglucanase Treatment of Wood Pulp

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma11091645

关键词

cellulose nanocrystals; endoglucanase treatment; acid hydrolysis; wood pulp; degree of crystallinity; fermentable sugars

资金

  1. BioFuelNet Canada [3N]
  2. Future Energy Systems (FES, University of Alberta) [T01-P01]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN 298352-2013]
  4. InnoTech Alberta Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, fermentable sugars and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were co-produced from endoglucanase treatment of wood pulp, followed by acid hydrolysis. Enzymatic hydrolysis was performed using two endoglucanases differentiated by the presence or absence of a cellulose-binding domain (CBD). The enzyme with an intact CBD gave the higher glucan conversion (up to 14.1 +/- 1.2 wt %) and improved the degree of crystallinity of the recovered wood pulp fiber (up to 83.0 +/- 1.0%). Thus, this endoglucanase-assisted treatment successfully removed amorphous content from the original cellulosic feedstock. CNC recovery (16.9 +/- 0.7 wt %) from the feedstock going into the acid hydrolysis was improved relative to untreated pulp (13.2 +/- 0.6 wt %). The mass loss from enzymatic treatment did not cause a decrease in the CNC yield from the starting material. The characteristics of CNCs obtained through acid hydrolysis (with or without enzyme treatment of pulp) were analyzed using X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry as characterization techniques. The CNCs generated through acid hydrolysis of endoglucanase-treated wood pulp displayed comparable properties relative to those generated using untreated pulp. Thus, endoglucanase treatment can enable co-production of CNCs and sugars for biofuel fermentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据