4.6 Article

In Situ DRIFTS Studies of NH3-SCR Mechanism over V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2 Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma11081307

关键词

in situ DRIFTS; V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2; catalysts; NH3-SCR mechanism; NOx; adsorption

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Projects of Jiangsu Province [BE2017716]
  2. National Key RD Plan [2017YFB0603201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2-ZrO2 (Ti-Zr) carrier was prepared by a co-precipitation method and 1 wt. % V2O5 and 0.2 CeO2 (the Mole ratio of Ce to Ti-Zr) was impregnated to obtain the V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3. The transient activity tests and the in situ DRIFTS (diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy) analyses were employed to explore the NH3-SCR (selective catalytic reduction) mechanism systematically, and by designing various conditions of single or mixing feeding gas and pre-treatment ways, a possible pathway of NOx reduction was proposed. It was found that NH3 exhibited a competitive advantage over NO in its adsorption on the catalyst surface, and could form an active intermediate substance of -NH2. More acid sites and intermediate reaction species (-NH2), at lower temperatures, significantly promoted the SCR activity of the V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst. The presence of O-2 could promote the conversion of NO to NO2, while NO2 was easier to reduce. The co-existence of NH3 and O-2 resulted in the NH3 adsorption strength being lower, as compared to tests without O-2, since O-2 could occupy a part of the active site. Due to CeO2's excellent oxygen storage-release capacity, NH3 adsorption was weakened, in comparison to the 1 wt. % V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst. If NOx were to be pre-adsorbed in the catalyst, the formation of nitrate and nitro species would be difficult to desorb, which would greatly hinder the SCR reaction. All the findings concluded that NH3-SCR worked mainly through the Eley-Rideal (E-R) mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据