4.2 Article

Contrast Enhancement of the Anterior Eye Segment and Subarachnoid Space: Detection in the Normal State by Heavily T-2-weighted 3D FLAIR

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 193-199

出版社

JPN SOC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.10.193

关键词

anterior eye segment; contrast enhancement; fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; magnetic resonance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) has been reported more sensitive than T-1-weighted images in detecting low concentration gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) in fluid, and heavily T-2-weighted (hT(2)W) 3-dimensional (3D) FLAIR has recently been reported even more sensitive than conventional 3D FLAIR. We investigated whether high signal of the anterior eye segment (AES) and subarachnoid space (SAS) in various locations as well as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in cisterns and ventricles can be detected on hT(2)W 3D FLAIR images obtained 4 hours after intravenous administration of GBCM in subjects without eye and SAS diseases. Methods: Ten patients suspected of having Meniere's disease underwent hT(2)W 3D FLAIR 4 hours after intravenous administration of single-dose GBCM to evaluate endolymphatic hydrops. We evaluated signal intensity of AES, SAS surrounding the optic nerve, SAS in Meckel's cave, CSF in the internal auditory canal, CSF in the prepontine cistern, CSF in the lateral and fourth ventricles, and lymph fluid in the cochlea by comparison with non-contrast images obtained in a separate group of 5 patients. The signal intensity of each structure was normalized by that of the pontine parenchyma. Results: We observed no signal difference in images of the pontine parenchyma obtained before and after enhancement. Significant signal difference was seen in all structures except the lateral and fourth ventricles. Conclusion: Four hours after intravenous injection, GBCM can be detected by hT(2)W 3D FLAIR in various fluid-containing spaces, such as the AES and various SAS and CSF spaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据