4.2 Article

Increased Sensitivity to Low Concentration Gadolinium Contrast by Optimized Heavily T-2-weighted 3D-FLAIR to Visualize Endolymphatic Space

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 73-80

出版社

JPN SOC MAGNETIC RESONANCE MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.9.73

关键词

advanced imaging techniques; magnetic resonance imaging; temporal bone disease; 3D imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To increase the sensitivity of 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) to low concentration gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast medium, we optimized sequence parameters on a phantom and evaluated the optimized sequence in patients suspicious for endolymphatic hydrops. Materials and Methods: All scans were performed on a 3-tesla magnetic resonance (MR) unit using a 32-channel head coil. We optimized sequence parameters using a phantom filled with diluted Gd and compared the optimized protocol with 3D-FLAIR using conventional turbo spin echo sequence (3D-FLAIR-CONY). Nine patients underwent scanning using the newly optimized sequence and 3D-FLAIR-CONY 4 hours after double-dose administration of intravenous Gd. We subjectively scored separation of endo- and perilymph space and measured contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between endo- and perilymph. Results: The optimized sequence in the phantom study consisted of: repetition time, 9000 ms; echo time, 540 ms; inversion time, 2400 ms; low constant readout flip angle, 120 degrees in the later part of the echo train. Image contrast became heavily T-2 weighted (hT(2)W-3D-FLAIR). In patients, we recognized endolymphatic space for both the cochlea and vestibule significantly better by hT2W-3D-FLAIR than 3D-FLAIR-CONY (P < 0.01). The mean CNR of the new method was also better than that of 3D-FLAIR-CONV (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The newly optimized hT2W-3D-FLAIR was more sensitive than the previous method to low concentration of Gd. Visualization of the endolymphatic space by double-dose administration of intravenous Gd would be more reliable using hT(2)W-3D-FLAIR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据