4.5 Article

Managing water-related energy in future cities - a research and policy roadmap

期刊

JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 161-175

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2013.063

关键词

energy; future cities; greenhouse gas emissions; urban metabolism; water

资金

  1. Australian-American Fulbright Commission
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  3. University of California Berkeley
  4. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)
  5. Queensland Government
  6. University of Queensland
  7. CSIRO
  8. Griffith University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water-related energy accounts for around one-quarter of California's energy use. Most of the influence is within cities. This project aimed to identify research and policy needs associated with managing energy related to urban water. A workshop was convened with diverse representation from water and energy sectors in federal (US), state (California) and municipal governments, research and regulatory agencies, universities, utilities, not-for profit and private sectors. The workshop established a vision of future cities, including elements of success, research needs and barriers. A subsequent on-line survey was used to estimate the potential, effort and 'potential-to-effort' ratio of each suggested element. First suggested steps in the roadmap include: development of educational programmes, combined standards, guidelines, funding and planning for water and energy efficiency, improved understanding and management of factors motivating consumers, and improved methods to quantify and track targets of 'water-related energy and related greenhouse gas emissions'. The 'roadmap' could help streamline future effort and sequencing action. The authors note and reflect on the importance of representation at such a workshop, and an effort is made to understand sources of variability in viewpoints. The semi-quantitative method used could have relevance to wider resource management issues and complex problem resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据