4.2 Article

An evaluation of the World Health Organization's 1997 and 2009 dengue classifications in hospitalized dengue patients in Malaysia

期刊

出版社

J INFECTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.4283

关键词

dengue; WHO 1997; WHO 2009; Malaysia

资金

  1. FRGS [1001/PPSP/812039, 600 - RMI/ ST/FRGS 5/3/Fst (69/2010)]
  2. DANA Kecemerlangan UiTM [600 - RMI/ STDANA 5/3/Dst (281/2009)]
  3. Long Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS) for dengue research [600-RMI/LRGS 5/3 (3/2011)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The latest revised version of the World Health Organization's dengue classification was released in 2009. A handful of studies have taken initiatives to evaluate the old and revised guidelines to determine early signs and symptoms of severe dengue. This retrospective study aimed to compare the classification of dengue using both the 1997 and 2009 guidelines in a selected cohort of dengue patients from Peninsular Malaysia between 2008 and 2012. Methodology: Adult dengue patients were recruited from tertiary hospitals in two different states, Selangor and Kelantan, in Peninsular Malaysia. Their clinical manifestations were assessed. Results: A total of 281 confirmed dengue patients were enrolled; the mean duration of illness at admission was five days. Of these, 88.6%, 10.7%, and 0.7% were classified according to the 1997 guidelines as having dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), respectively. When the WHO 2009 guidelines were applied, 17.1%, 78.3%, and 4.6% were classified as dengue without warning signs, dengue with warning signs, and severe dengue, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggests that the revised WHO 2009 guidelines stratify a much larger proportion of patients into a category that requires a higher level of medical and nursing care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据