4.2 Article

Expression of ompR gene in the acid adaptation and thermal resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis SE86

期刊

出版社

J INFECTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.3584

关键词

Salmonella Enteritidis; ompR; thermal resistance; acid adaptation

资金

  1. CAPES (Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the involvement of the ompR gene in the acid adaptation and thermal resistance of S. Enteritidis SE86, responsible agent of more than 95 % of investigated food-borne diseases, throughout the last decade in Southern Brazil. In this study, we constructed a mutant strain of S. Enteritidis SE86 (Delta ompR) that was attenuated by a knockout technique. The OmpR protein expression was determined in a tagged (3XFLAG) strain of S. Enteritidis SE86. Methodology: The mutant strains were cultivated separately in nutrient broth and nutrient broth supplemented with 1% glucose (NBG) to induce acid adapted cells. The organisms were exposed to different temperature such as 37 degrees C, 52 degrees C, and 60 degrees C. The survival of the SE86 wild type (WT) and attenuated strain was determined by bacterial count, and the tagged protein (ompR:: 3XFLAG cat:: FLAG) was detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibodies. Results: Results showed that when exposed at 52 degrees C, the acid-adapted SE86 WT cells were completely inactivated after 300 minutes; however, non-adapted cells (WT and Delta ompR) and acid-adapted Delta ompR demonstrated higher thermal sensitivity, since they were completely inactivated in 240 minutes. At 60 degrees C, the acid-adapted SE86 Delta ompR also demonstrated higher sensitivity that SE86 WT, being totally inactivated after 15 minutes, while the WT cells were inactivated in 20 minutes. Conclusion: The acid adapted cells showed increased expression of OmpR when exposed to 52 degrees C and 60 degrees C, this confirmed the requirement of acid adaptation for S. Enteritidis SE86 to resist elevated temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据