4.3 Article

Safety and tolerability of empagliflozin in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: Pooled analysis of phase I-III clinical trials

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 418-428

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12910

关键词

Adverse drug event; Genital infection; Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/Introduction We investigated the safety and tolerability of empagliflozin (EMPA) in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods Data were pooled from participants with type 2 diabetes evenly randomized to a placebo, EMPA 10 mg or EMPA 25 mg in 15 phase I-III trials. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed in the subgroup of trial participants from East Asian countries/regions. Results In total, 709, 724 and 708 East Asian trial participants with type 2 diabetes received a placebo, EMPA 10 mg and EMPA 25 mg, respectively; total exposure was 953, 1,072, and 1,033 patient-years in these groups, respectively. The EMPA and placebo groups had similar incidences of severe AEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation. Incidences of hypoglycemia differed according to anti-diabetes medication used at baseline. Higher rates of events consistent with genital infection were observed with EMPA (EMPA 1.5-1.7/100, placebo 0.2/100 patient-years). Rates of AEs consistent with volume depletion were comparable among treatment groups (0.8-1.4/100 patient-years), but in trial participants aged >= 65 years, the rate was greater with EMPA 25 mg (EMPA 25 mg 3.5/100, placebo 2.0/100 patient-years). Incidences of events consistent with urinary tract infection, thromboembolic events, renal events, hepatic AEs, diabetic ketoacidosis, fractures and lower limb amputation were similar between EMPA and the placebo. Conclusions In the present pooled analysis, EMPA was well tolerated in East Asian type 2 diabetes patients based on >2,100 patient-years' exposure, consistent with results from the overall analysis population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据