4.3 Article

Decreased levels of circulating CD34+ cells are associated with coronary heart disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 473-478

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12310

关键词

Circulating progenitor cell; Coronary heart disease; Endothelial function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/IntroductionCirculating progenitor cells, including CD34 positive (CD34(+)) cells, play a key role in neovascularisation and the maintenance of vascular endothelial function. Several lines of evidence show an association between decreased levels of circulating CD34(+) cells and cardiovascular disease. However, the contribution of circulating CD34(+) cells to the occurrence of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients remains unclear. Materials and MethodsIn the present study with a median follow up of 4.6years, we analyzed the level of circulating CD34(+) cells in 192 patients with type2 diabetes. The outcome variables were coronary heart disease (CHD) events (cardiovascular death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) and cerebrovascular disease events (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage or transient ischemic attack). ResultsDecreased levels of circulating CD34(+) cells were associated with a significantly higher incidence of CHD based on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P=0.0052). After adjusting for age, sex, dyslipidemia, hypertension, glycated hemoglobin, history of cardiovascular disease, body mass index, and statin and renin angiotensin system inhibitors use, decreased levels of CD34(+) cells were significantly associated with the incidence of CHD events (hazard ratio of low tertile 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.22-5.96; P=0.013, reference; high tertile). ConclusionsDecreased levels of circulating CD34(+) cells might predict CHD events in patients with diabetes, and this could be useful for identifying patients with diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据