4.3 Article

Macrophage stimulating agent soluble yeast β-1,3/1,6-glucan as a topical treatment of diabetic foot and leg ulcers: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase II study

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 392-399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12165

关键词

Diabetic foot; Wound healing; beta-Glucans

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Biotec Pharmacon ASA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/Introduction: Dysregulated inflammatory response is believed to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of several late complications of diabetes mellitus. beta-Glucans are potent inducers of immune function. The present randomized, double blind, two-center, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to explore safety, tolerability and efficacy of soluble beta-1,3/1,6-glucan (SBG) as a local treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and lower extremity ulcers (Wagner grade 1-2, Ankle/Brachial Index >= 0.7) received SBG or a comparator product (methylcellulose) locally three times weekly up to 12 weeks in addition to conventional management scheme. A total of 54 patients completed the study. Results: A tendency for shorter median time to complete healing in the SBG group was observed (36 vs 63 days, P = 0.130). Weekly percentage reduction in ulcer size was significantly higher in the SBG group than in the methylcellulose group between weeks 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 (P < 0.05). The proportion of ulcers healed by week 12 was also in favor of SBG (59% vs 37%, P = 0.09), with a significantly higher healing incidence in the SBG group at week 8 (44% vs 17%, P = 0.03). SBG was safe and well tolerated. There was a clinically significant difference regarding the incidence of serious adverse events in favor of the SBG treatment. Conclusions: Local treatment of diabetic lower extremity ulcers with b-1,3/1,6-polyglucose shows good safety results. This beta-glucan preparation shows promising potential as a treatment accelerating cutaneous healing. Further studies are required to confirm this effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据