4.3 Article

Increased arterial stiffness is closely associated with hyperglycemia and improved by glycemic control in diabetic patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 82-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00229.x

关键词

Arterial stiffness; Cardio-ankle vascular index; Glycemic control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/Introduction Although arteriosclerotic diseases have been reported to be frequently complicated by diabetes mellitus (DM), a detailed relationship between hyperglycemia and arterial stiffness has not been fully clarified. We investigated the influence of hyperglycemia on arterial stiffness using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), which is a new method for estimating arterial stiffness. Materials and Methods CAVI values of 52 early-staged DM patients (duration <5years, no microangiopathies) were compared with those of 43 age-matched non-diabetic (NDM) subjects. The association between CAVI and clinical background factors was evaluated. The effect of glycemic improvement on CAVI was examined in 36 DM patients who were hospitalized for 2weeks to treat hyperglycemia. CAVI and clinical parameters were measured twice during hospitalization and again after 8weeks. Additionally, we measured CAVI before and 2h after breakfast in five DM and five NDM subjects. Results The CAVI of DM patients was significantly higher than that of NDM subjects. Multiple regression analysis showed that neither hypertension, obesity nor dyslipidemia, but aging and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were significantly related to CAVI elevation. The CAVI, HbA1c and total cholesterol (TC) had significantly improved. Improvement of CAVI was significantly associated with HbA1c improvement. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the improvements of TC and CAVI. CAVI values before and after breakfast did not change significantly. Conclusions CAVI elevation seems to be a sensitive arteriosclerotic marker, which is closely associated with hyperglycemia and improved by glycemic control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据