4.3 Article

Acne vulgaris and depression: a retrospective examination

期刊

JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 59-63

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00478.x

关键词

depression; acne; psychological disability; isotretinoin

资金

  1. Galderma Laboratories, L.P.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease that affects patients both physically and mentally. Purpose To examine the prevalence of reported depression in acne patients. Methods Patient information was obtained from a medical claims database and analyzed using the Total Resource Utilization Benchmarks (TM) process. Benchmarks in this study include: age, gender, co-morbid depression, antidepressant utilization, and acne treatment modality. Depression prevalence in acne patients was compared with general population. Results Depression was two to three times more prevalent in acne patients than in the general population, with a reported 8.8% of acne patients having clinical depression. The majority of cases of depression and antidepressant therapy utilization were observed in acne patients aged 18 and over with the highest percentage in the 36-64 age group. Approximately 65.2% of the acne patient population was female, with twice as many reported to have depression as males (10.6% females vs. 5.3% males). Limitations This analysis included only patients that sought treatment for their acne and had also reported having clinical depression. This may underestimate the total prevalence of acne and associated depression. Conclusions Acne is a disease that affects people of all ages both physically and psychologically. A correlation exists between clinical depression and acne patients, particularly those older than 36. There is no single disease which causes more psychic trauma and more maladjustment between parents and children, more general insecurity and feelings of inferiority and greater sums of psychic assessment than does acne vulgaris'' (Sulzberger, 1948(1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据