4.4 Article

Interactions between water-land resources and oasis urban development at the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID LAND
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 221-229

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1227.2012.00221

关键词

oasis urban development; water-land resources; coupling factors; coupling degree; northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XBBS200805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40901092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban development in arid and semi-arid regions is largely constrained by fragile physical environments. The characteristics of an urban settlement are different from those in other regions of China. This paper analyses the coupling characteristics and spatio-temporal variations for oasis urban development and water-land resources at the northern slopes of the Tianshan Mountains by principal component analysis and a coupling degree model. The result shows that the degree and change in regional use of water and land resources are different among the studied cities/counties during their development. The built-up areas of these cities/counties have changed little with increasing populations and urbanization levels, which well reflects that the urban development in arid and semi-arid regions is limited by oasis areas. Per capita amount of water supplied, however, presented a trend of slowed growth with increasing levels of urbanization. Water consumption gradually increased with urban development and the improvement of people's living standards, accompanied by enhanced water use efficiency. The level of urbanization can be assessed through the coupling degree between oasis urban development and the use of water and land resources. A high coupling degree represents a high level of comprehensive urban development and use of water-land resources. Alternatively, a low coupling degree denotes a low level of urban development and water-land resource use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据