4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A study of decision process in MCDM problems with large number of criteria

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12102

关键词

decision process; criteria reduction; tolerance relation; prospect theory; risk preferences; weighted majority advantage value

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71301075]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20130770]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530261]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation [1301108C]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20123219120032]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [30920130132014]
  7. Young Teachers Research Foundation in School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China [JGQN1401]
  8. Zijin Intelligent Program, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an effective decision process method is proposed to address the challenge in a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem because of large number of criteria. This method is based on the criteria reduction, tolerance relation, and prospect theory (PT). By building a discernibility matrix for tolerance relation (DMTR) in an MCDM problem with numerical values or interval numbers, this method first allows us to recognize a set of critical criteria from a large criteria pool, and ignore the other criteria. Next, it establishes the criteria weights through the DMTR as they are usually not indicated in the data. Then, the method ranks all the choices and selects the most desirable choice according to the weighted majority advantage value(WMAV). Here two risk-preference assumptions are proposed based on the PT and tolerance degree to select the WMAVs of different interval numbers with the same expectation. Using different risk-preference assumptions, we separately build WMAVs for different types of DMs. Finally, we presented two voting examples to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据