4.5 Article

A method for fuzzy group decision making based on induced aggregation operators and Euclidean distance

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12015

关键词

induced aggregation operators; fuzzy numbers; Euclidean distance; FIEOWAD operator; group decision making

资金

  1. National Funds of Social Science of China [12ATJ001, 12ZD211]
  2. Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation [LQ12G03010, Y6110777]
  3. Academician Workstation of Zhejiang, Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Fund [11YJC790141]
  4. Ningbo Soft Science Fund [2011A1012]
  5. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [2011A610106]
  6. Zhejiang new generation mobile Internet client innovation team [2012R10009-07]
  7. Science and Technology Innovation Team of Ningbo [2012B82003]
  8. Philosophy and Social Science Key Research Base of Zhejiang Province-The Port Modern Service Industry and Creative Research Center
  9. Port Economic Innovation Team of Zhejiang

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present the fuzzy-induced Euclidean ordered weighted averaging distance (FIEOWAD) operator. It is an extension of the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator that uses the main characteristics of the induced OWA (IOWA), the Euclidean distance and uncertain information represented by fuzzy numbers. The main advantage of this operator is that it is able to consider complex attitudinal characters of the decision maker by using order-inducing variables in the aggregation of the Euclidean distance. Moreover, it is able to deal with uncertain environments where the information is very imprecise and can be assessed with fuzzy numbers. We study some of its main properties and particular cases such as the fuzzy maximum distance, fuzzy minimum distance, fuzzy-normalized Euclidean distance (FNED), fuzzy-weighted Euclidean distance (FWED), and fuzzy Euclidean ordered weighted averaging distance (FEOWAD) operator. Finally, we present an application of the operator to a group decision-making problem concerning the selection of strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据