4.7 Article

The challenge of cancellations on the day of surgery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 1126-1130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.002

关键词

Theatre management; Bed management; Surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Cancellations of planned surgical procedures have been a major and long-standing problem for healthcare organisations across the world. They represent a significant loss of revenue and waste of resources, have significant psychological, social and financial implications for patients and their families and represent a significant loss of training opportunities for surgical trainees. The current study investigates the reasons for day of surgery cancellations at an NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom and proposes strategies to reduce their incidence. Methods: All cancellations of elective and emergency procedures during the period from January 2012 to December 2012 were identified retrospectively using the IQ Utopia (TM) patient management software. Results: The rate of cancellations on the day of surgery for elective and planned emergency procedures during 2012 was 5.19%. The main reason for cancellation was patient not fit for operation (33.73%), followed by lack of beds (21.79%), lack of theatre time (17.31%), patient failed to attend (6.87%) and operation no longer necessary (4.08%). Conclusions: Similar reasons for cancellations have been reported in studies from around the world. The published literature provides various examples of successful and unsuccessful strategies to reduce surgery cancellations, even when they are caused by factors that are sometimes considered unavoidable. The feasibility and profitability of approaches that have been proven to be successful in other institutions should be assessed thoroughly in the context of the individual institution's characteristics and individual problems before a decision for implementation is made. (C) 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据