4.2 Article

Comparative ultrastructure of CRM1-Nucleolar bodies (CNoBs), Intranucleolar bodies (INBs) and hybrid PML/p62 bodies uncovers new facets of nuclear body dynamic and diversity

期刊

NUCLEUS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 326-338

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2015.1082695

关键词

CNoB; INB; immunoelectron microscopy; nuclear organization; nucleolus; nuclear bodies; p62; SQSTM1; PML bodies; SUMO; ubiquitin

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-14-CE09-0013-01]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE09-0013] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to gain insights on the nuclear organization in mammalian cells, we characterized ultrastructurally nuclear bodies (NBs) previously described as fluorescent foci. Using high resolution immunoelectron microscopy (I-EM), we provide evidence that CNoBs (CRM1-Nucleolar bodies) and INBs (Intranucleolar bodies) are distinct genuine nucleolar structures in untreated HeLa cells. INBs are fibrillar and concentrate the post-translational modifiers SUMO1 and SUMO-2/3 as strongly as PML bodies. In contrast, the smallest CRM1-labeled CNoBs are vitreous, preferentially located at the periphery of the nucleolus and, intricately linked to the chromatin network. Upon blockage of the CRM1-dependent nuclear export by leptomycin B (LMB), CNoBs disappear while p62/SQSTM1-containing fibrillar nuclear bodies are induced. These p62 bodies are enriched in ubiquitinated proteins. They progressively associate with PML bodies to form hybrid bodies of which PML decorates the periphery while p62/SQSTM1 is centrally-located. Our study is expanding the repertoire of nuclear bodies; revealing a previously unrecognized composite nucleolar landscape and a new mode of interactions between ubiquitous (PML) and stress-induced (p62) nuclear bodies, resulting in the formation of hybrid bodies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据