4.8 Article

Nano-structured non-platinum catalysts for automotive fuel cell application

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 293-300

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.002

关键词

Fuel cell; Non-PGM catalyst; ORR; Automobile; MEA; State-of-the-art

资金

  1. DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technology Program
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  3. Center for Synchrotron Biosciences Grant from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NBIB) [P30-EB-009998]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly active and durable non-platinum group metal (non-PGM) electrocatalyst was synthesized at high temperature from a catalyst precursor involving a ferrous iron salt and a nitrogen-containing charge-transfer salt as a precursor to form a nano-structured catalyst with performance level that makes it suitable for automotive applications. Such precursors have not been previously investigated for non-PGM catalysts. The synthesized material belongs to the class of metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts and possesses an open-frame structure controlled by the silica-templating synthesis method. Thorough characterization using X-ray photoelectron, Mossbauer and in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopies demonstrates the successful formation of FeNxCy moieties that are active towards the oxygen reduction reaction. We report high kinetic current densities and high power performance in both rotating disk electrode and membrane electrode assembly studies. This Fe-N-C catalyst, jointly investigated by academic and industry partners, has shown high durability under different protocols, including that defined by the US Department of Energy Durability Working Group and Nissan's load cycling protocol. In summary, the present Fe-N-C catalyst is highly active and durable, making it a viable alternative to Pt-based electrocatalysts for automobile fuel cell applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据