4.8 Article

A general fabrication procedure for efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells: Morphological and interfacial control by in-situ-generated layered perovskite

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 165-175

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.010

关键词

Perovskite solar cell; Polymeric ammonium; Layered perovskites; Morphology; General approach

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61504053, 51172103, 61464006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20151BAB217023]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2014-3-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to the 3D lead-halide perovskites (MAPbX(3), X=I/Cl), two dimensional (2D) perovskites have more flexible structures, with more relaxed limitations in the size of the organic cations and produce interesting variant of photophysical and electronic properties. Here, a universal deposition approach for stable and efficient MAPbX(3) perovskite solar cells (PeSCs) displaying excellent reproducibility are presented via in-situ formed layered perovskites derived from polymeric ammonium anchor. The critical effect of in-situ formed layered perovskite (PEI)(2)[Pbl(4)] on the morphological and interfacial control of the above 3D perovskite are identified, and it is demonstrated that 2D perovskite films promote the formation of above perovskite films composed of micron-sized grains and provide better energy level alignment at the interface. Moreover, the incorporation of great moisture-resistant 2D materials, accompanying uniform and dense MAPbX(3) films enhances long-term stability of the perovskite solar cells. As a result, a maximum PCE value of 13.8% for MAPbl(3) solar cells on flexible substrate are achieved in ambient air. It is anticipated that our strategies to design and explore low dimensional perovskites can provide alternative route to address the critical concerns of stability and reproducibility in PeSCs. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据