4.8 Article

Hematite nanorods Co-doped with Ru cations with different valence states as high performance photoanodes for water splitting

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 320-328

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.005

关键词

alpha-Fe2O3; Nanorods; Co-doping; Ruthenium doped; Photoelectrocatalysis; Water splitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371097, 21071079]
  2. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering [ZK201209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports the synthesis and characterization of sub-10 nm, porous Ru-doped alpha-Fe2O3 nanorods (NRs) as well as their implementation as photoanodes for water splitting. Highly photoactive Ru-doped alpha-Fe2O3 NR films were prepared by deposition of the ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate [Ru(acac)(3)]-treated presynthesized ultrathin alpha-FeOOH NR precursors onto FTO substrates via a doctor blading process, followed by annealing at 700 degrees C in air. The photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting performance of the undoped and Ru-doped alpha-Fe2O3 NR photoanodes was characterized and optimized by varying the precursor molar ratio of alpha-FeOOH to Ru(acac)(3). Significantly, under simulated 1 sun illumination, the optimized Ru-doped alpha-Fe2O3 NR films obtained at a Fe/Ru molar ratio of 100/5 yield a stable, record photocurrent density of similar to 5.7 mA cm(-2) and the highest incident photon to current conversion efficiencies (IPCEs) at 1.23 V vs a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and show an onset potential of anodic photocurrent around 0.7 V vs RHE. The excellent PEC performance benefits from: (i) the simultaneously increased charge carrier concentration and mobility and (ii) charge balance provided by codoping of different valent Ru cations, resulting in a significant reduction of the defects that are supposed to serve as the recombination centers for photogenerated electrons and holes in the alpha-Fe2O3 lattice. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据