4.4 Article

Outer retinal changes following acute optic neuritis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 362-372

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458515590646

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; optic neuritis; optical coherence tomography; retinal ganglion cells; retinal photoreceptors; optic nerve injuries

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY014993, R01 EY019473] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [5R01NS082347-02, R01 NS082347] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Retinal nerve fiber and ganglion cell+inner plexiform (GCIP) layer thinning following multiple sclerosis-related acute optic neuritis (AON) is well described. However, whether AON results in changes in the inner nuclear (INL), outer plexiform (OPL), outer nuclear (ONL) and/or photoreceptor segment (PS) layers remains undetermined. Objectives: The objective of this paper is to determine if INL+OPL and/or ONL+PS changes occur following AON. Methods: Thirty-three AON patients underwent serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual function testing (mean follow-up: 25 months). Longitudinal changes in retinal layer thickness were analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression. Results: Four months following AON, the mean decrease in GCIP thickness relative to baseline was 11.4% (p < 0.001). At four months, a concomitant 3.4% increase in average ONL+PS thickness was observed (p < 0.001). The percentage decrease in GCIP thickness and increase in ONL+PS thickness were strongly correlated (r = -0.70; p < 0.001). Between months 4 to 12, ONL+PS thickness declined and, at 12 months, was no longer significantly different from baseline (mean change: 0.5%; p = 0.37). Similar, albeit less robust, changes in the INL+OPL were observed. Conclusions: Following AON, dynamic changes occur in the deep retinal layers, which are proportional to GCIP thinning. These novel findings help further our understanding of the biological and/or anatomical sequelae resulting from AON.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据