4.7 Article

A novel method for classifying starch digestion by modelling the amylolysis of plant foods using first-order enzyme kinetic principles

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 2751-2758

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4fo00115j

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC, UK [DRINC BB/H004866/1]
  2. BBSRC CASE studentship award with Premier Foods (UK)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H004866/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/H004866/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying starch amylolysis kinetics in vitro is valuable for predicting the postprandial glycaemic response to starch intake. Prediction of starch amylolysis behaviour is challenging however, because of the many physico-chemical factors which influence amylolysis. The Logarithm of Slope (LOS) method for analysis of digestibility curves using first-order enzyme kinetics can identify and quantify nutritionally important starch fractions. The early stages of in vitro amylolysis of hydrothermally processed chickpea and durum wheat with variable degrees of structural integrity were studied. The end-point product concentration (C-infinity) and the pseudo first-order digestibility rate constant k, obtained from LOS analysis, were then used to compute predictive digestibility curves for evaluation of the model performance. LOS analysis enabled rapid identification of nutritionally important starch-fractions. It was clear that purified starches and flours were digested by a single-phase process, but starch amylolysis in macroparticles occurred by a two-phase system that reflected differences in substrate accessibility. The model gave an excellent fit to data obtained from a range of heterogeneous materials. It provides a rigorous means of studying the mechanisms of starch amylolysis in samples of varying complexity, and we strongly recommend its use for the rapid and accurate predictions of amylolysis. Such predictions have implications for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据