4.5 Article

Anxiety, depression, quality of life and stress in patients with resistant hypertension before and after catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation

期刊

EUROINTERVENTION
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 700-708

出版社

EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I6A114

关键词

anxiety; cognition; depression; quality of life; renal denervation; resistant hypertension; stress tolerance

资金

  1. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kardiologie
  2. Deutsche Herzstiftung
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG KFO 196 ZP]
  4. Ministry for Education and Science of the Saarland
  5. Deutsche Hochdruckliga

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: This study analysed quality of life (QoL), anxiety and depression, headache and stress tolerance in patients with resistant hypertension before and after renal denervation (RDN). Methods and results: RDN was performed in 119 patients (age 62 +/- 11 years, 55% male) with resistant hypertension (office blood pressure [BP] 165/91 +/- 22/15 mmHg), treated with 5.7 +/- 0.2 antihypertensive drugs. At baseline, at three and at six months after RDN, psychological status, intensity of headache and stress tolerance were documented. Stress was induced by a multitasking situation (Wiener Determination Task [DT]). Depression and anxiety (hospital anxiety and depression scale) and QoL (short form-12 health survey) were investigated. Intensity of headache was measured by visual analogous scale. Systolic and diastolic BP decreased by -20 +/- 2.4 and -10 +/- 1.4 mmHg, respectively, six months after RDN (p<0.0001). Patients showed more correct reactions (p<0.0001), fewer errors (p<0.05) and reacted faster (p<0.001) in the DT. Patients reported an improvement in QoL (p<0.05). Furthermore, anxiety (p<0.0001) and depression (p<0.0001) scores decreased. Intensity of headache decreased after RDN (p<0.01). Conclusions: RDN is associated with reduced anxiety and depression, intensity of headache and with improved QoL and stress tolerance in patients with resistant hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据