4.2 Article

Metal stamping character recognition algorithm based on multi-directional illumination image fusion enhancement technology

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s13640-018-0321-7

关键词

Metal stamping characters (MSCs); Multi-directional illumination; Image fusion; Character segmentation; Character recognition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1609205, 51605443]
  2. Public Welfare Technology Application Projects of Zhejiang Province [2017C31053]
  3. 521 Talent Project of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal stamping character (MSC) automatic identification technology plays an important role in industrial automation. To improve the accuracy and stability of segmentation and recognition for MSCs, an algorithm based on multi-directional illumination image fusion technology is proposed. First, four grayscale images are taken with four bar-shape directional light sources from different directions. Next, based on the difference in surface grayscale characteristics for the different illumination directions of the surface's stamped depression regions and flat regions, the image background is extracted and eliminated. Second, the images are fused using the difference processing on the images in the two groups of relative illuminant directions. Third, mean filter, binarization, and morphological closing operations are performed on the fused image to locate and segment the character string in the image, and the characters are normalized by correcting the skew of the segmented character string. Finally, histogram of oriented gradient features and a backpropagation neural network algorithm are employed to identify the normalized characters. Experimental results show that the algorithm can effectively eliminate the interference of factors such as oil stains, rust, oxide, shot-blasting pits, and different background colors and enhance the contrast between MSCs and background. The resulting character recognition rate can reach 99.6%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据