4.3 Article

Data Fusion for Improved Respiration Rate Estimation

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1155/2010/926305

关键词

-

资金

  1. Information and Communications University (ICU) in Daejeon, South Korea
  2. U.S. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  3. American Heart Association (AHA) [0840159N]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 EB001659, HL73146, HL085188-01A2, HL090897-01A2, K24HL093218-01A1, T32-HL07901]
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K24HL093218] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB001659] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an application of a modified Kalman-Filter (KF) framework for data fusion to the estimation of respiratory rate from multiple physiological sources which is robust to background noise. A novel index of the underlying signal quality of respiratory signals is presented and then used to modify the noise covariance matrix of the KF which discounts the effect of noisy data. The signal quality index, together with the KF innovation sequence, is also used to weight multiple independent estimates of the respiratory rate from independent KFs. The approach is evaluated both on a realistic artificial ECG model (with real additive noise) and on real data taken from 30 subjects with overnight polysomnograms, containing ECG, respiration, and peripheral tonometry waveforms from which respiration rates were estimated. Results indicate that our automated voting system can outperform any individual respiration rate estimation technique at all levels of noise and respiration rates exhibited in our data. We also demonstrate that even the addition of a noisier extra signal leads to an improved estimate using our framework. Moreover, our simulations demonstrate that different ECG respiration extraction techniques have different error profiles with respect to the respiration rate, and therefore a respiration rate-related modification of any fusion algorithm may be appropriate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据