4.3 Article

Multimorbidity in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 17-22

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2012.714768

关键词

Diabetes; patient involvement

资金

  1. Health Research Board of Ireland through the HRB Centre for Primary Care Research [HRC/2007/1]
  2. Health Research Board of Ireland [S/A 009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: People with type 2 diabetes frequently have a variety of related and unrelated chronic conditions. These additional conditions have implications for patient education, treatment burden and disease management. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the nature of multimorbidity, and its impact on GP visits, polypharmacy and glycaemic control as measured by HbA1c, in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes attending general practice in Ireland. Methods: A cohort of 424 patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a cluster randomized controlled trial based in Irish general practice was examined. Patient data included: medical conditions, HbA1c, health service utilization, socio-economic status and number of prescribed medications. Results: 90% of patients had at least one additional chronic condition and a quarter had four or more additional chronic conditions. 66% of patients had hypertension; 25% had heart disease; and 16% had arthritis. General practitioner visits and polypharmacy increased significantly with increasing numbers of chronic conditions. When comparing patient self-report with medical records, patients who reported a higher proportion of their conditions had better glycaemic control with a significantly lower HbA1c score. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of multimorbidity in these patients with type 2 diabetes and the results suggest that glycaemic control is related to patients' awareness of their chronic conditions. The variety of conditions emphasizes the complexity of illness management in this group and the importance of maintaining a generalist and multidisciplinary approach to their clinical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据