4.3 Article

Comparison of the gut microbiomes of 12 bony fish and 3 shark species

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 518, 期 -, 页码 209-223

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11034

关键词

Fish gut; Gut microbiome; 16S rRNA; Gut microflora; 454-pyrosequencing; Shark gut; Core gut microbiome

资金

  1. NOAA Oceans and Human Health Initiative Traineeship [S0867882]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1237140] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used massively parallel sequencing (pyrosequencing) of 16S rRNA genes to compare the composition of microbial communities in the guts of 12 bony fish and 3 shark species. The species analyzed encompass herbivores and carnivores with varied digestive physiologies, are classified as pelagic and demersal species, and reside in estuarine to marine environments. We also compared the gut microbial assemblages of wild and cultured Fundulus heteroclitus and of juvenile and adult Lagodon rhomboides. A total of 1 214 355 sequences were filtered, denoised, trimmed, and then sorted into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 97% sequence similarity. Bacteria representing 17 phyla were found among the sampled fish, with most fish hosting between 7 and 15 phyla. Proteobacteria OTUs were present in all fish and often dominated the libraries (3.0 to 98%; average: 61%). Firmicutes were also prevalent, but at a lower relative abundance, ranging between 1.3 and 45% (average: 17%). In most cases, the gut microflora of individual fish of a given species contained many of the same OTUs; however, some species (e. g. great barracuda) shared few OTUs among the individuals sampled. Although no single OTU was shared among all fish species, many of the OTUs present in one species' core group were also found in the core groups of other species. Several OTUs were consistently found in the guts of multiple species, suggesting that these OTUs may be important contributors to fish gut functions such as digestion, nutrient absorption, and immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据