4.3 Review

Shark and ray provisioning: functional insights into behavioral, ecological and physiological responses across multiple scales

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 538, 期 -, 页码 273-283

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11492

关键词

Anthropogenic disturbance; Ecological effects; Management; Non-consumptive exploitation; Shark conservation; Wildlife provisioning

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Ecologie, du Developpement durable et de l'Energie (MEDDE) of France
  2. Fonds Francais pour l'Environnment Mondial (FFEM)
  3. Delegation Regionale a la Recherche et a la Technologie (DRRT) of French Polynesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of olfactory stimuli and the provision of food are a common practice to prompt artificial aggregations of emblematic wild species and ensure the economic viability of the wildlife-watching industry. Several elasmobranch species have been targeted by such operations in a variety of locations for over 4 decades. A recent review succinctly addressed the potential effects of shark diving tourism, including shark provisioning, on shark individual behavior and ecology, but the paucity of data on the ecology of elasmobranchs precluded general statements. By using a functional framework, we reviewed the findings of the 22 available studies that investigated the behavioral, physiological, and ecological response of 14 shark and 3 ray species targeted by artificial provisioning. Focusing on the underlying processes that rule the response of targeted elasmobranch species, we report further effects acting beyond the individual scale. We suggest that the most commonly described alterations of individual movement patterns have cascading effects through the group and community scales, ultimately resulting in altered health condition and individual behavior toward humans. We conclude by stressing the potential for provisioning activities to support the investigation of complex ecological and behavioral processes in elasmobranchs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据