4.5 Article

Expert curation in UniProtKB: a case study on dealing with conflicting and erroneous data

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/database/bau016

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [UniProt 4U41HG006104-04, GO 5U41HG002273-13, 5R01GM080646-08, 5G08LM01 0720-03, 5P20GM103446-13]
  2. British Heart Foundation [SP/07/007/23671]
  3. Swiss Federal Government through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation
  4. Enzyme Commission [GEN2PHEN (200754), MICROME (222886)]
  5. National Science Foundation [DBI-1062520]
  6. Swiss Federal Government through the Federal Office of Education and Science
  7. British Heart Foundation [SP/07/007/23671] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot provides expert curation with information extracted from literature and curator-evaluated computational analysis. As knowledgebases continue to play an increasingly important role in scientific research, a number of studies have evaluated their accuracy and revealed various errors. While some are curation errors, others are the result of incorrect information published in the scientific literature. By taking the example of sirtuin-5, a complex annotation case, we will describe the curation procedure of UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and detail how we report conflicting information in the database. We will demonstrate the importance of collaboration between resources to ensure curation consistency and the value of contributions from the user community in helping maintain error-free resources. Database URL: www.uniprot.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据