4.2 Review

Animal models of antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 505-513

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328358e484

关键词

macaque models; microbicides; preexposure prophylaxis; tenofovir; emtricitabine

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Y1-AI-0681-02]
  2. National Institutes of Health [Y1-AI-0681-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Oral and topical pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs are novel biomedical interventions recently found to prevent HIV transmission among high-risk populations. In this review, we outline lessons learned from animal studies and discuss next steps in preclinical PrEP research including the study of new PrEP modalities, pharmacologic correlates of protection, and biological factors that may modulate PrEP efficacy. Recent findings Studies using macaque or humanized mice models of mucosal simian immunodeficiency virus (Sly), HIV, or simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) transmission have provided efficacy data against rectal and vaginal infection. A multitude of oral and topical PrEP regimens including drugs such as tenofovir (TFV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) were tested against either wild-type or drug-resistant viruses. These models have also helped define prophylactic windows of protection of nondaily dosing and are being used increasingly to study pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships. Summary As human data from PrEP trials validate animal models or help fine tune them, it is expected that these models will play increasingly important roles in PrEP development as the field extends into new drug classes and combinations, episodic dosing, and novel long-acting drug formulations. By providing both efficacy and pharmacologic information these models can define correlates and mechanisms of protection, inform dose selection, and advance the most promising PrEP candidates and dosing modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据